Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \because the government was not responsible for the dividends paid ... offset would not be proper\
• stating that “under the statutory scheme of priority for thrift creditors, the FDIC is obligated to completely satisfy the claim of the government, specifically that of the FSLIC Resolution Fund”
• limiting restitutionary damages for breach of Winstar -related contract to capital contributions that were contractually required
• limiting restitutionary damages for breach of Winstar-related contract to capital contributions that were contractually required
• affirming the trial court’s denial of damages because the magnitude of damages was not foreseeable
• describing “two alternative measures of relief in restitution,” either the “value of the benefits received by the defendant due to the plaintiff’s performance,” or “the cost of the plaintiff’s performance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).