Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that plaintiffs bear the burden of demonstrating “what KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO v. US 18 might have been”
• denying restitution on the basis that the only benefit arguably conferred on the government—time—was not amenable to valuation
• stating that plaintiff bears the burden of “establishing what might have been.”
• approving award of restitution and reliance damages on ground that plaintiff failed to prove expectation damages
• “ ‘The basic aim of restitution is to place tire plaintiff in the same economic position as the plaintiff enjoyed prior to contracting.’ ”
• expectancy damages often are equated with lost profits, and may include other damage elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).