Skip to main content
FLMD· 8/19/2009

Knights Armament Co. v. Optical Systems Technology, Inc.

Citations

  • 647 F. Supp. 2d 1321
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73605
  • 2009 WL 2579278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that party failed to show \UNS” had a distinct meaning where the parly \consistently use[d] UNS in conjunction with and as an abbreviation of ‘Universal Night Sight.’ ”
  • no secondary meaning where movant “consistently uses [shortform] in conjunction with, and as an abbreviation of [the full name]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anne C. Conway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.