Bickley Ex Rel. Georgia Pacific Corp. Life Health & Accident Plan v. Caremark Rx, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 23.1’s requirements should not be engrafted onto ERISA, which contains its own well-defined enforcement scheme
• “the court reads the PBM Agreement to provide that Care-mark is not given (nor does it have control over) Plan money.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).