Skip to main content
· 8/15/2006

Hamed v. State

Citations

  • 852 N.E.2d 619
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1593
  • 2006 WL 2347797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing the merits of an expired no contact order because, if a violation of the order were later alleged, it could contribute to a contempt proceeding or a criminal charge
  • “The long-standing rule in Indiana courts has been that a case is deemed moot when no effective relief can be rendered to the parties before the court.”
  • addressing merits of claim because of possible negative collateral consequences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Najam, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.