· 8/15/2006
Hamed v. State
Citations
- 852 N.E.2d 619
- 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1593
- 2006 WL 2347797
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing the merits of an expired no contact order because, if a violation of the order were later alleged, it could contribute to a contempt proceeding or a criminal charge
- “The long-standing rule in Indiana courts has been that a case is deemed moot when no effective relief can be rendered to the parties before the court.”
- addressing merits of claim because of possible negative collateral consequences
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharpnack, Najam, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.