King v. Zakaria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting concern that evidence of defendant’s insurer could motivate jury to award greater damages
• plaintiff’s expert testified that it did not matter that defendant deviated from standard of care because patient’s condition was unsalvageable
• plaintiff’s expert testified that it did not matter that defendant deviated from standard of care because patient’s condition was unsalvageable
• “[t]he admission of evidence is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, whose determination shall not be disturbed on appeal unless it amounts to an abuse of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).