Skip to main content
· 7/6/2007

Haughton v. Canning

Citations

  • 650 S.E.2d 718
  • 287 Ga. App. 28
  • 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 2390
  • 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a doctor's motion for directed verdict when plaintiff could not show that the defendant doctor's sharing of medical information with other physicians amounted to a \public\ and thus wrongful disclosure
  • affirming a doctor’s motion for directed verdict when plaintiff could not show that the defendant doctor’s sharing of medical information with other physicians amounted to a “public” and thus wrongful disclosure
  • a jury charge “must not be argumentative or seek an expression of opinion on the part of the court”
  • “Three elements are essential to establish a medical malpractice claim: the doctor’s duty to his patient; the doctor’s breach of that duty through the failure to exercise the requisite degree of skill and care; and an injury proximately caused by the doctor’s failure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Miller, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.