Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 161 S.W.3d 264
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 2508
  • 2005 WL 756276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the two indictments and the record of the plea and revocation hearings were insufficient to determine 11 defendant’s double-jeopardy claim
  • the two indictments and the record of the plea and revocation hearings were insufficient to determine defendant's double-jeopardy claim
  • applying general rule to deferred adjudication
  • applying general rule to deferred adjudication
  • applying general rule to deferred adjudication
  • applying general rule to deferred adjudication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.