Arhelger v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when a motion to continue is made on non-statutory grounds or the motion fails to meet the statutory criteria, the decision to grant or deny the motion is within the discretion of the trial court
• finding defendant did not make a \valid offer of proof” where defendant did not \even touch upon the grounds for ... admission” of the cross-examination testimony
• finding defendant did not make a “valid offer of proof” where defendant did not “even touch upon the grounds for . . . admission” of the cross-examination testimony
• finding defendant did not make a “valid offer of proof” where defendant’s explanation did not make the substance of the evidence clear to the court and did not “even touch upon the grounds for ... admission” or relevance of the cross-examination testimony
• discussing development of rule requiring offer to prove on cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).