Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 477 A.2d 768
  • 300 Md. 218
  • 1984 Md. LEXIS 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defective notice that still informed defendant of potential sentencing enhancement was a harmless procedural error
  • failure of State to file notice of its intent to seek enhanced penalties at sentencing was harmless error under the circumstances
  • involving an inappropriate testimonial exchange

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky, Couch, Morton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.