Glover v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the state relied solely on hearsay evidence regarding Appellant’s release date from prison, it failed to prove an essential requirement for sentencing pursuant to the PRR Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ives v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-22· cited 57×
• Gray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-25· cited 50×
• Desue v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-25· cited 15×
• Peterson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-13· cited 8×
• Campbell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-07· cited 3×
• G.T. v. Department of Children & Family Services
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-15· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-13· cited 14×
• Sinclair v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-29· cited 12×