Skip to main content

King v. People

Citations

  • 785 P.2d 596
  • 14 Brief Times Rptr. 32
  • 1990 Colo. LEXIS 2
  • 1990 WL 2006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that even if hearsay evidence qualifies as admissible under 803(4), evidence may still be excluded under Rule 403
  • explaining that a \statement reliable enough to serve as a basis for psychiatric diagnosis should also be considered reliable enough to escape the hearsay proscription\
  • requiring the proponent to establish, as a foundation for admission, that the psychiatrist relied on the information in arriving at his pertinent opinion
  • referring to a physician who \pre-serib[les] a course of treatment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named King v. People

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.