Hull v. Hull
Citations
- 14 Pa. Super. 520
- 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 74
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Review by appellate court.</p> <p>A proceeding in divorce is subjected in the appellate court to scrutiny from beginning to end. Particularly is this directed to the testimony, in order that the merit or demerit of the application may on the whole be determined.</p> <p>Divorce — Desertion—Evidence—Facts not inferences must be proved.</p> <p>It is not enough to allege a wilful and malicious desertion. The libellant must, in order to be entitled to a divorce, exhibit facts from which the court may legally infer the breach of obligation. He cannot withhold facts and prove the inference.</p> <p>Desertion is an actual abandonment of mutual cohabitation with intent to desert.</p> <p>A divorce will not be decreed where the evidence establishes a separation which is not wilful and malicious desertion.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Oready, Portee, Porter, Rice, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- King v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-04-20· cited 33×
- Pearce v. PearceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-02-27· cited 14×
- Edgar v. EdgarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-05-22· cited 12×
- Kelly v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-10-14· cited 12×
- Cooper v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-10-12· cited 5×
- Arnout's EstateSchuylkill County Orphans' Court· 1924-02-11
- Carl v. CarlPerry County Court of Common Pleas· 1943-10-23
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.