King v. King
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2970
Syllabus
Trial court properly denied appellant's motion for contempt, granted appellee's motion, and awarded appellee attorney fees of $500. Motion for shared parenting properly denied where parties did not cooperate or communicate well. Residential parent properly awarded tax exemptions where trial court noted that it would qualify her for Medicaid. Equal parenting time did not require 50 percent downward deviation in child support. Clerical errors and math error in child-support calculation required remand.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Booth v. BoothOhio Supreme Court· 1989-07-26· cited 1,162×
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-05-29· cited 245×
- State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-16· cited 71×
- Huelskamp v. HuelskampOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-12-28· cited 44×
- Heilman v. HeilmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-05· cited 22×
- Irish v. IrishOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-27· cited 15×
- King v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-02· cited 10×
- In re J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-16· cited 7×
- Passage v. PassageOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-18· cited 6×
- Williams v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-09· cited 6×
- Ford v. FordOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-26· cited 4×
- Dobbins v. DobbinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.