Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/28/2019
King v. King
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 722
Syllabus
Trial court did not err when it granted wife's motion to liquidate spousal support arrearage.
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fort Frye Teachers Ass'n v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court· 1998-04-22· cited 265×
- Connin v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-13· cited 158×
- O'Nesti v. DeBartolo Realty Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 151×
- Holzemer v. UrbanskiOhio Supreme Court· 1999-07-28· cited 88×
- Ft. Frye Teachers Assn., OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-04-22· cited 79×
- State ex rel. Nickoli v. Erie MetroParksOhio Supreme Court· 2010-02-25· cited 55×
- Andrews v. Ohio State Teachers Retirement System BoardOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-21· cited 34×
- Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2006-07-06· cited 33×
- Daniel v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-28· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.