Boyd v. Boyd

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 4775

Syllabus

Based on the evidence in the record and appellant's repeated acknowledgment that he failed to pay on the home equity line of credit, we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by finding appellant in contempt. The trial court, however, abused its discretion awarding appellee $15,000 in compensatory damages. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's motion to approve the purchase offer. Judgment affirmed, in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded with instructions.