Third Circuit· 9/19/1988
King v. Hilton-Davis
Citations
- 855 F.2d 1047
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is [plaintiff’s] bargain that determines his or her economic loss and whether he or she has been injured beyond that loss.”
- \In determining whether a product `injures only itself' for purposes of applying the East River rule . . . [one must] look to the product purchased by the plaintiff\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co.Supreme Court· 1997-06-02· cited 152×
- Hininger v. Case Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1994-06-22· cited 37×
- Hdm Flugservice Gmbh v. Parker Hannifin CorporationSixth Circuit· 2003-06-19· cited 34×
- Capitol Fuels, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 20×
- American Stores Properties, Inc. v. Spotts, Stevens & McCoy, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-08-13· cited 10×
- Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. Koch Industries, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2002-02-08· cited 9×
- Albers v. Deere & Co.D. North Dakota· 2008-09-24· cited 6×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-16· cited 1,227×
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-11· cited 208×
- Aloe Coal Company and Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Clark Equipment Co.Third Circuit· 1987-05-04· cited 175×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 87×
- Shipco 2295, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1987-08-28· cited 68×
- King v. Hilton-DavisThird Circuit· 1988-08-23· cited 63×
- Rodney Clark v. Delaval Separator CorporationFifth Circuit· 1981-03-19· cited 45×
- Manor Junior College v. Kaller's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-18· cited 37×
- Cedars of Lebanon Hosp. Corp. v. European X-Ray DistributorsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-24· cited 35×
- Streich v. Hilton-Davis, Div. of Sterling DrugMontana Supreme Court· 1984-12-13· cited 31×
- Airlift International, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation Douglas Aircraft Company McDonnell Douglas Finance Corporation and the Deutsch CompanyNinth Circuit· 1982-06-21· cited 28×
- Sanco, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., Sanco, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Ford Motor Co., Defendant-Cross-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1985-08-29· cited 25×
- Johnson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-03· cited 24×
- Luther A. Hunter v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1986-08-11· cited 21×
- County of Westchester v. General Motors Corp.S.D. New York· 1983-01-19· cited 18×
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Major Tool & Machine, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1985-07-08· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.