Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 9/19/1988

King v. Hilton-Davis

Citations

  • 855 F.2d 1047
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is [plaintiff’s] bargain that determines his or her economic loss and whether he or she has been injured beyond that loss.”
  • \In determining whether a product `injures only itself' for purposes of applying the East River rule . . . [one must] look to the product purchased by the plaintiff\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.