King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting fraudulent concealment argument in part because plaintiffs’ counsel had knowledge of the defendant’s participation in the conspiracy twenty-two months prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).