The Travelers Indemnity Company v. United States of America for the Use of Construction Specialties Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that service on a parent company—which owned 100% of a subsidiary, shared offices with the subsidiary, had the same managers and directors as the subsidiary—adequately notified the company’s subsidiary of the action
• stating that the “ends of justice are not served when forfeiture of just claims because of technical rules is allowed”
• “The exercise of discretion in this area necessarily involves concern for the rights of the amending party; but the rights of the added party likewise cannot be ignored.”
• “The ends of justice are not served when forfeiture of just claims because of technical rules is allowed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).