Kim Decker v. Nancy Berryhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that 17 “[j]udges are not physicians” and holding that abnormal medical laboratory reports, 18 without more, do not compel a different result from that reached by the ALJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• James Wischmann v. Kilolo Kijakazi
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-05-17· cited 69×
• Maria Medina Tovar v. Laura Zuchowski
  Ninth Circuit· 2022-07-21· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thomas v. Arn
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 28,671×
• Hensley v. Eckerhart
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
• Pierce v. Underwood
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 6,197×
• Brewes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-06-14· cited 677×
• Thomas FLORES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-05· cited 365×
• Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-11-03· cited 323×
• Jeffrey Meier v. Carolyn W. Colvin
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-07-23· cited 229×
• Kimberly Gardner v. Nancy Berryhill
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-05-09· cited 56×
• Jill Campbell v. Michael Astrue
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-11-26· cited 44×