District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/21/1992
Keys v. State
Citations
- 606 So. 2d 669
- 1992 WL 230422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the purpose of rule against stacking inferences is to protect against verdicts or judgments based on speculation
- explaining that verdicts or judgments may not be based on speculation
- retrospective application of Fenelon is required by Smith
- followed Fenelon based on Smith.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zehmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. StormCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-08-15· cited 68×
- State v. ConsaulCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-11-25· cited 33×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-26· cited 28×
- Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-01· cited 13×
- Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-25· cited 12×
- Shatzer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-08-26· cited 11×
- Sapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-22· cited 7×
- Kelvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-30· cited 6×
- State v. DupontDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-02· cited 5×
- Perrine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-14· cited 3×
- Crocker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-20· cited 2×
- Phillips v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-19· cited 2×
- Miranda v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-07· cited 2×
- Lord v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-29· cited 2×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-26· cited 2×
- Riles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-22· cited 1×
- People v. StormCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-08-16
- GEORGE O. SHRADER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-23
- State v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-30
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-07
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 963×
- Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 848×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-02· cited 169×
- Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-06-25· cited 148×
- Horace Franklin Dunkins, Jr. v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner of Alabama Department of Corrections, and W.E. Johnson, Warden, Holman UnitEleventh Circuit· 1988-08-18· cited 102×
- Fenelon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-13· cited 93×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-10-28· cited 61×
- Smith v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 39×
- Sirmons v. PittmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-03-13· cited 30×
- Bagley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-04-05· cited 29×
- Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-14· cited 29×
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-02-14· cited 28×
- Gaidymowicz v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-05-22· cited 27×
- Busbee v. QuarrierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-02-11· cited 18×
- Weeks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-21· cited 9×
- Franklin v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-01-20· cited 9×
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-16· cited 8×
- Viniegra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.