Miranda v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to prove offense of burglary, it was necessary only to show that at time of entry into building, defendant had fully informed intent to commit offense of criminal mischief, and not that defendant had committed offense of criminal mischief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eanes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-18· cited 5×
• Conrad v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blanco v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-05-07· cited 141×
• Toole v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-11· cited 73×
• Butler v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-04· cited 70×
• Keys v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-21· cited 24×
• Pugh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-23· cited 9×
• Mason v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-12· cited 5×