Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/9/1984
Kerns v. Kerns
Citations
- 474 A.2d 925
- 59 Md. App. 87
- 1984 Md. App. LEXIS 347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no need to show a change of circumstances following a pendente lite order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Garrity, Bloom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-22· cited 132×
- Frase v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-11· cited 37×
- Leary v. LearyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-06· cited 30×
- Kovacs v. KovacsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-01· cited 28×
- Skeens v. PaternoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-09-07· cited 27×
- Santo v. SantoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-11· cited 18×
- Bienenfeld v. Bennett-WhiteCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-29· cited 10×
- Hill v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-29· cited 10×
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-10· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-05-11· cited 119×
- Sartoph v. SartophCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-31· cited 25×
- Krebs v. KrebsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-10-13· cited 25×
- Winter v. Crowley, Jr.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-04-16· cited 20×
- McAndrew v. McAndrewCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-02-28· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.