Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/29/1992
Bienenfeld v. Bennett-White
Citations
- 91 Md. App. 488
- 605 A.2d 172
- 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court in a custody proceeding may only consider evidence of religious views or practices of the party seeking custody to the extent that such view or practices bear upon the physical or emotional welfare of the child
- “It is well established that child custody determinations be made by careful examination of facts on a case-by-case basis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wagner v. WagnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-06· cited 66×
- County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-11· cited 64×
- Marquis v. MarquisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-12· cited 21×
- Droney v. DroneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-01-03· cited 19×
- Reichert v. HornbeckCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-20· cited 15×
- Gillespie v. GillespieCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-29· cited 12×
- In re: O.P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-29· cited 11×
- Gizzo v. GerstmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-01· cited 7×
- Azizova v. SuleymanovCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-21· cited 5×
- In re: K.Y.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-30
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 3,250×
- Zummo v. ZummoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-17· cited 91×
- Domingues v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-21· cited 82×
- Montgomery County Department of Social Services v. SandersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-10· cited 70×
- Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-06-30· cited 69×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-05· cited 64×
- Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-07-08· cited 41×
- McCready v. McCreadyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-21· cited 39×
- Shell Oil Co. v. RyckmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-07-09· cited 33×
- Levitsky v. LevitskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-05-07· cited 30×
- In Re the Marriage of ShortSupreme Court of Colorado· 1985-02-04· cited 21×
- Woodham v. WoodhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-06-26· cited 19×
- Daubert v. DaubertCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-06-25· cited 18×
- In Re Ann M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-02· cited 17×
- Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-04· cited 13×
- Shunk v. WalkerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-05-14· cited 13×
- In Re the Marriage of HadeenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-11-03· cited 12×
- Kerns v. KernsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-09· cited 12×
- Thomas v. Allegany County Board of EducationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-04-07· cited 8×
- Battaglia v. BattagliaNew York Supreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.