Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/1/1993
Kovacs v. Kovacs
Citations
- 633 A.2d 425
- 98 Md. App. 289
- 1993 Md. App. LEXIS 174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding \that a chancellor cannot adopt an arbitration award that concerns the beneficial interests of children without first exercising independent judgment to determine whether the best interests of the children are met by the award\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bloom, Cathell, Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-05-05· cited 121×
- Kelm v. KelmOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 95×
- Anderson v. LitzenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-28· cited 59×
- Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-14· cited 46×
- Frase v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-11· cited 37×
- Tuetken v. TuetkenTennessee Supreme Court· 2010-09-22· cited 30×
- Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-06· cited 24×
- Mandl v. BaileyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-30· cited 18×
- Moore v. TseronisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-06· cited 18×
- Birkey Design Group, Inc. v. Egle Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-01-03· cited 12×
- MCR of America, Inc. v. GreeneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-26· cited 12×
- Hill v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-29· cited 10×
- Ghertner v. SolaimaniCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-03-25· cited 8×
- Letke Security Contractors, Inc. v. United States Surety Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-29· cited 8×
- McCormack v. Board of EducationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-02· cited 7×
- Bloch v. BlochCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-05· cited 5×
- Lang v. LeviCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-01· cited 5×
- In Re Alethea W.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-07· cited 4×
- Taylor v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court· 2022-08-18· cited 4×
- Cohoon v. CohoonIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-06-27· cited 3×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Newell v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-10· cited 109×
- Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-08· cited 96×
- Domingues v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-21· cited 82×
- Vaughn v. HinchySupreme Court· 1983-01-17· cited 78×
- Azcon Construction Co. v. Golden Hills Resort, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-04-07· cited 41×
- McCready v. McCreadyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-21· cited 39×
- Leary v. LearyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-06· cited 30×
- Nagle v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-05-31· cited 24×
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. BraggCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-06· cited 20×
- Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-02-02· cited 17×
- Agur v. AgurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1969-04-07· cited 17×
- Hamel v. HamelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-03-21· cited 14×
- Kerns v. KernsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-09· cited 12×
- Lieberman v. LiebermanNew York Supreme Court· 1991-01-25· cited 12×
- Marriage of Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-06-25· cited 11×
- Reese v. HuebschmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-02-05· cited 11×
- Lorenzini v. Group Health Plan, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-06-30· cited 11×
- Phil J. Corporation v. MarkleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-05-10· cited 9×
- Tayco Const. v. LaCUISINE RESTAURANTLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-01-30· cited 8×
- Newell v. RichardsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-08-08· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.