Skip to main content
· 1/21/1994

Le Elder v. Rice

Citations

  • 21 Cal. App. 4th 1604
  • 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 749
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 761
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 502
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressly rejecting a rule establishing 24-hour employer liability for on-call employees m a case where the employee had an automobile accident right after dropping off his children at school
  • “Public 21 policy would be ill-served by a rule establishing 24-hour employer liability for on-call 22 employees, regardless of the nature of the employee’s activities at the time of the accident.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sonenshine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.