Kennard v. Comstock Resources, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that relators had \direct and independent knowledge\ because they did \their own investigation\
• \A relator need not . . . have in his possession knowledge of the actual fraudulent conduct itself; knowledge underlying or supporting the fraud allegation is sufficient.\ (alteration in original) (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).