United States Ex Rel. Estate of Cunningham v. Millennium Laboratories of California, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for district court to consider whether the relator had stated a claim after vacating order dismissing complaint on jurisdictional grounds
• comparing allegations \in the original complaint and retained in the amended complaint\ to prior public disclosure
• refusing to dismiss based on the shotgun nature of a pleading and nothing instead that “a pleading deficiency is usually addressed by motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e)”
• denying challenge to a “shotgun pleading” under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)
• \Knowledge is 'independent' if it did not depend on the public disclosure. . . .\
• “Ordinarily, the issue of stating multiple claims in a single count is dealt with as a ‘shotgun’ pleading, or a pleading that fails to identify claims with sufficient clarity to enable a defendant to frame a responsive pleading.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).