California Court of Appeal· 4/20/2006
Kelton v. Stravinski
Citations
- 41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 877
- 138 Cal. App. 4th 941
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 4739
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3320
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 553
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he general rule is that covenants not to compete are void.”
- discussing franchising under California law
- discussing franchising under California law
- discussing franchising under California law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesNinth Circuit· 2009-01-29· cited 230×
- Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-10-18· cited 41×
- Dowell v. Biosense Webster, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2009-10-20· cited 39×
- Quidel Corp. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-08-29· cited 30×
- City of Oakland v. HasseyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-06-17· cited 27×
- USS-POSCO Industries v. Floyd CaseCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-01-26· cited 19×
- In re Marriage of Gréaux & MerminCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-02-14· cited 12×
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesNinth Circuit· 2007-09-07· cited 4×
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesNinth Circuit· 2008-01-23· cited 3×
- Alliance Payment Systems, Inc. v. WalczerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-06-25· cited 2×
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv WestNinth Circuit· 2007-09-07
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociationNinth Circuit· 2008-01-23
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv WestNinth Circuit· 2009-01-29
- Quidel Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2019-08-29
- Quidel Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-06
- Brown v. TGS Management Co., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-11-12
- Kyablue v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-11-06
- Tak Chun Gaming Promotion Company Limited v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-10-26
- Tak Chun Gaming Promotion Company Limited v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-11-17
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-03-11· cited 101×
- Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court· 1965-08-19· cited 85×
- Kolani v. GluskaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-06-01· cited 80×
- Kashani v. TSANN KUEN CHINA ENTERPRISE CO.California Court of Appeal· 2004-05-11· cited 33×
- Tiedje v. Aluminum Taper Milling Co.California Supreme Court· 1956-05-04· cited 32×
- Cislaw v. Southland Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1992-03-25· cited 30×
- Hill Medical Corporation v. WycoffCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-01-30· cited 27×
- Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc. v. Silent Watchman Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1975-10-08· cited 26×
- South Bay Radiology Medical Associates v. W. M. Asher, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1990-04-24· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.