Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc. v. Silent Watchman Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting plaintiffs failure to “develop material evidence” to support its claim under § 16600 that “performance of the [exclusive-dealing] contract [would] foreclose competition in a substantial share of the affected .line of commerce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).