Cislaw v. Southland Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “franchisor must be permitted to retain such control as is necessary to protect and maintain its trademark, trade name and good will, without the risk of creating an agency relationship with its franchisees”
• considering whether an agency relationship exists between a franchisor and its franchisee and finding that franchisor was not liable for wrongful death arising from franchisee’s sale of clove cigarettes to a minor
• franchisor’s interest in reputation of its entire system allows it to exercise certain controls over the enterprise without running the risk of transforming an independent contractor/franehisee into an agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. JTH Tax, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-01-17· cited 101×
• Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
  California Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 88×
• Aleksick v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-05-08· cited 75×
• Emery v. Visa International Service Ass'n
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-01-08· cited 66×
• Ciup v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-09-30· cited 61×
• Kaplan v. Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-11-26· cited 51×
• Holmes v. Lerner
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-09-07· cited 44×
• F. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, LTD. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-06-27· cited 40×
• Darryl Williams v. Jani King of Philadelphia Inc
  Third Circuit· 2016-09-21· cited 37×
• Kelton v. Stravinski
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-04-20· cited 27×
• WDT-WINCHESTER v. Nilsson
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-08-04· cited 23×
• Smith v. Foodmaker, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-08-08· cited 22×
• Thornton v. Ford Motor Co.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2012-12-28· cited 12×
• Aviles v. Wayside Auto Body, Inc.
  D. Connecticut· 2014-09-30· cited 12×
• Redevelopment Agency v. International House of Pancakes, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-09-28· cited 7×
• Estate of Anderson v. Denny's Inc.
  D. New Mexico· 2013-11-13· cited 2×
• Juarez v. Jani-King of California, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2011-03-04· cited 1×
• Walker v. Pacific Pride Services, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-08-12
• Pereda v. Atos Jiu Jitsu LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-11-23
• Hughes v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-12-03

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-05-22· cited 96×
• Troensegaard v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-12-04· cited 76×
• Hennefer v. Butcher
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-06-17· cited 48×
• People v. Park
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-12-20· cited 47×
• Kuchta v. Allied Builders Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-11-24· cited 37×
• Bohanon v. James McClatchy Publishing Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1936-08-21· cited 32×
• Nichols v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-02-17· cited 32×
• Weiss v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-09-30· cited 32×
• Wickham v. Southland Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-05-10· cited 27×
• Beck v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-10-28· cited 24×
• Holland v. Nelson
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-03-12· cited 19×
• Porter v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-03-13· cited 17×
• Gradus v. Hanson Aviation, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-08-02· cited 16×
• American Title Co. v. Anderson
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-10-17· cited 8×
• Wu v. Interstate Consolidated Industries
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-01-22· cited 6×