Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/4/2010
Kelly v. State
Citations
- 6 A.3d 396
- 195 Md. App. 403
- 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding closure was trivial where a sheriff’s officer had closed the courtroom to the public
- finding that excluding the defendant’s family for two to three hours of voir dire was trivial and did not warrant reversal
- concluding no abuse of discretion in denying a postponement of sentencing where “Appellant has failed to identify what information he was unable to present due to the court’s denial of his request”
- indicating the significance of the length of the closure is viewed in light of the significance of the proceedings that occurred during that closure by stating “(1) the limited duration of the closure, two to three hours during voir dire”
- noting, in the context of a waived appellate challenge for counsel's failure to object to a CSI voir dire question, \the record as a whole does not lead to the conclusion that the jurors were under the impression that convicting appellant was the only option.\
- noting, in the context of a waived appellate challenge for counsel's failure to object to a CSI voir dire question, \the record as a whole does not lead to the conclusion that the jurors were under the impression that convicting appellant was the only option.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zarnoch, Graeff, Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-27· cited 42×
- v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado· 2020-04-20· cited 26×
- v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado· 2020-06-01· cited 25×
- United States v. GuptaSecond Circuit· 2011-06-17· cited 20×
- Barrows v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-02-24· cited 20×
- Correll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-19· cited 15×
- Quansah v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 14×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-12-21· cited 14×
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-05· cited 13×
- Tracy Alan Zornes v. William BolinEighth Circuit· 2022-06-27· cited 12×
- Yates v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-22· cited 12×
- In Re Matthew S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-01· cited 11×
- Schnarr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2017-01-26· cited 11×
- Steward v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 9×
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-03· cited 9×
- Perry v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-28· cited 8×
- Dionas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-01· cited 7×
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-26· cited 7×
- Malaska v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-28· cited 6×
- Kyler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-07-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.