Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eleventh Circuit· 5/22/2003

Kelly v. Harris

Citations

  • 331 F.3d 817
  • 2003 WL 21196520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the standing requirement must be fulfilled in order for a federal court to have jurisdiction
  • noting that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and “always have an obligation to examine sua sponte their jurisdiction before reaching the merits of any claim.”
  • noting that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and “always have an obligation to examine sua sponte their jurisdiction before reaching the merits of any claim.”
  • “[F]ederal courts always have an obligation to examine sua sponte their jurisdiction before reaching the merits of any claim.”
  • “To have standing, a plaintiff must show (1) he has suffered an injury in fact that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) the injury is fairly traceable to conduct of the defendant; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Roney, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kelly v. Harris

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.