Alabama Power Co. v. United States Department of Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the utility companies need not “await a final decision by the Department”
• finding that the utility companies need not \await a final decision by the Department\
• deciding utilities’ claim that a reduction of Exelon Generation Company’s disposal fees pursuant Article IX(B) of the Standard Contract was tantamount to an improper expenditure from the Fund under Section 302(d)
• explaining that utility companies seeking to establish standing should not have to wait to challenge a final decision of the Department of Energy where the companies would \[i]n either circumstance ... be forced to pay for the damages ...\
• explaining that utility companies seeking to establish standing should not have to wait to challenge a final decision of the Department of Energy where the companies would “[i]n either circumstance ... be forced to pay for the damages ... ”
• severing a dependent clause containing a legislative veto from a statutory subsection because that clause was an unconstitutional “provision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).