Skip to main content

Kellogg v. State

Citations

  • 636 N.E.2d 1262
  • 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 813
  • 1994 WL 288157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “[p]roof that the defendant is the parent or legal guardian of the dependent establishes care ‘because of a legal obligation’”
  • “Proof that the passenger in Kellogg’s car was his child was not an element of the State’s case for the offense of neglect of a dependent.”
  • because the defendant had actual knowledge that he had consumed a substantial quantity of alcohol and that his child was a passenger in his vehicle, the jury could have reasonably inferred that the defendant had actual knowledge that a dangerous situation existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Hoffman, Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.