Kellie Farris v. Oakland County, Mich.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[u]nless the hypothetical question comprehensively describes the limitations on a claimant’s ability to function, a [vocational expert] will be unable to accurately assess whether jobs do exist for the claimant”
• stating that “[u]nless the hypothetical question comprehensively describes the limitations on a claimant’s ability to function, a vocational expert will be unable to accurately assess whether jobs do exist for the claimant”
• declaring, “[i]n light of the flawed hypothetical,” which omitted reference to claimant’s mental impairments, “the Secretary has not shown [claimant] retains sufficient residual functional capacity to perform gainful activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).