Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 2/12/2013

Keith v. Koerner

Citations

  • 707 F.3d 1185
  • 2013 WL 500703
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sustaining denial of a motion to dismiss warden where much more specific factual allegations produced a plausible claim of deliberate indifference
  • rejecting an argument that because a prison supervisor had certain responsibilities, “he must have been aware of [the aggressor's] criminal intent and did nothing to prevent it”
  • dismissing an insufficient argument that because a prison supervisor had certain responsibilities, \he must have been aware of [the aggressor's] criminal intent and did nothing to prevent it\
  • rejecting reliance on Barney and Hovater if prison official has “actual knowledge” of threat
  • “The denial of qualified immunity is an appealable final order . . . .” (citation omitted)
  • “[I]t is clearly established that a prison official’s deliberate indifference to sexual abuse by prison employees violates the Eighth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Murphy, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.