District of Columbia· 7/24/2015
Keepseagle v. Vilsack
Citations
- 118 F. Supp. 3d 98
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97574
- 2015 WL 4510837
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting the Government settled this case because it “implicate[s] deep-seated interests of justice” even if “the government’s legal defense may be relatively strong”
- suggesting the Government settled this case because it “implicated deep-seated interests of justice” even if “the government’s legal defense may be relatively strong”
- “Sweeping settlements with the three groups, [Tony] West [Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Civil Division], argued, would eliminate legal risks and smooth relations between the Agriculture Department and important constituencies.”
- rejecting request for additional distribution because settlement agreement did not provide for such distribution
- analyzing 10 modification of an incorporated settlement agreement under Rule 60(b) without written 11 agreement of the parties despite the incorporated agreement only permitting modification 12 pursuant to written agreement of the parties
- settlement agreement modifications are proper if done in accordance with the settlement agreement terms
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marilyn Keepseagle v. Sonny PerdueD.C. Circuit· 2017-05-16· cited 66×
- Smallwood v. LynchDistrict of Columbia· 2017-01-30· cited 3×
- Salazar v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-04-04· cited 2×
- Grynberg v. Bp P.L.C.District of Columbia· 2016-09-08· cited 2×
- In Re Black Farmers Discrimination LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-03
- Labatte v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2019-03-29
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 12,961×
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-04-23· cited 3,337×
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court· 2013-02-26· cited 3,172×
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 1,932×
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1932-05-02· cited 1,171×
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,152×
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1988-03-28· cited 256×
- Kramer, Mark Lee v. Rumsfeld, DonaldD.C. Circuit· 2007-03-06· cited 159×
- Austin Joseph Ryan v. United States Lines CompanySecond Circuit· 1962-05-16· cited 136×
- In Re Baby Products Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2013-02-19· cited 135×
- Nachshin v. Aol, LLCNinth Circuit· 2011-11-21· cited 126×
- Dan Duran v. Richard J. ElrodSeventh Circuit· 1985-04-26· cited 96×
- Salazar Ex Rel. Salazar v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2011-02-08· cited 94×
- New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareySecond Circuit· 1983-03-31· cited 82×
- Comfort v. Lynn School CommitteeFirst Circuit· 2009-03-12· cited 80×
- Masters v. Wilhelmina Model Agency, Inc.Second Circuit· 2007-01-04· cited 53×
- Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation v. Board of CommissionersFifth Circuit· 2010-12-17· cited 43×
- William J. McLean v. James L. MeekSupreme Court· 1856-01-18· cited 39×
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1996-05-31· cited 39×
- In re: Veneman, AnnD.C. Circuit· 2002-10-29· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.