In re: Veneman, Ann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a fundamental issue of law unlikely to evade end-of-case review could nonetheless be appropriate for 23(f) review in “special circumstances”
• denying a 23(f) petition “because the critical questions required to resolve it are entirely unbriefed”
• denying interlocutory, review of an unsettled, fundamental, and important question of class action law that was not “likely to evade end-of-the-case review”
• denying interlocutory review of an unsettled, fundamental, and important question of class action law that was not “likely to evade end-of-the-case review”
• declining to exercise 23(f) discretion because the important, unresolved issues were entirely unbriefed
• “due process requires that putative class members receive notice and an opportunity to opt out”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).