Austin Joseph Ryan v. United States Lines Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the docketing of a notice of appeal “ousts the district court of jurisdiction except insofar as it is reserved to it explicitly by statute or rule.”
• holding that the docketing of a notice of appeal “ousts the district court of jurisdiction except insofar as it is reserved to it explicitly by statute or rule.”
• explaining that Rule 60(b)(5) applies only to forward-looking injunctive orders and “does not cover the case of a judgment for money damages”
• explaining that Rule 60(b)(5) applies only to forward-looking injunctive orders and “does not cover the case of a judgment for money damages”
• explaining that Rule 60(b)(5) applies only to forward-looking injunctive orders and “does not cover the case of a judgment for money damages”
• worker denied new trial to seek greater damages when examination 10 months after trial revealed increased disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).