Kauffman v. Wootters
Citations
- 138 U.S. 285
- 11 S. Ct. 298
- 34 L. Ed. 962
- 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2082
Syllabus
<p>State legislation simply forbidding the defendant to come into court and challenge the validity of service upon him in' a personal action, without surrendering himself to the jurisdiction of the court, but which does not attempt to restrain him from fully protecting his person, his property and his rights against any attempt to enforce a judgment rendered without due process of law, is not in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment:</p> <p>York v. Texas, 137 U. S. 15, affirmed and applied.</p>
Judges: Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court· 1915-05-03· cited 263×
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court· 1892-11-21· cited 257×
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court· 1893-05-01· cited 130×
- Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court· 1914-11-30· cited 72×
- McLaughlin Brothers v. HallowellSupreme Court· 1913-04-07· cited 41×
- Groel v. United Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery· 1905-04-18· cited 22×
- Maysville & B. S. R. R. Co. v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1900-03-29· cited 21×
- Norfolk Southern R. v. ForemanFourth Circuit· 1917-07-16· cited 17×
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway v. SladeSupreme Court· 1910-01-31· cited 12×
- Chinn v. Foster-Milburn Co.W.D. New York· 1912-03-07· cited 3×
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. GoodrichSupreme Court· 1913-05-05· cited 1×
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. GoodrichSupreme Court· 1914-06-22
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. GoodrichEighth Circuit· 1914-03-16
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.