Southern Pacific Co. v. Denton
Citations
- 146 U.S. 202
- 13 S. Ct. 44
- 36 L. Ed. 942
- 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2189
Syllabus
<p>Under the act of March 3,1887, c. 373, § 1, as corrected by the act of August 13,1888, c. 866, a'corporation incorporated in one State only, and doing business in another State, is not thereby liable to be sued in a Circuit Court of the United States, held in the latter State.</p> <p>The want of the requisite citizenship of parties to give jurisdiction to a ' Circuit Court of the United States, when apparent on the face of the petition, may be taken advantage of by demurrer.</p> <p>An objection to the jurisdiction of a Circuit Court of the United' States, for want of the requisite citizenship of the parties, is not waived by filing a demurrer for the special and single purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction, or by answering to the merits upon that demurrer being overruled.</p> <p>The right of a corporation, sued in a Circuit Court of'the United States, to contest its jurisdiction for want of the requisite citizenship of the parties, is not affected by a statute of the State in which the court is held, requiring a foreign corporation, before doing business in the State, to file with the secretary of state a copy of its charter, with a resolution authorizing service of process to be made on any officer or agent engaged in its business within the State, and' agreeing to be subject to, all the provisions .of the statute, one of which is that the corporation shall not remove any suit from a court of the State into the Circuit Court of the United States; nor by doing business and appointing an agent within the State under that statute.</p> <p>A statute of a State, which makes an appearance in behalf- of a defendant, although in terms limited to the purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction of the court, a waiver of immunity from jurisdiction’by reason of non-residence, is not applicable to actions in a Circuit Court of the United States, held within the State, under Rev. Stat., § 914..</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a statute, which “require[ed] the corporation, as a condition precedent to obtaining a permit to do business within the state, to surrender a right and privilege secured to it by the constitution and laws of the United States, was unconstitutional and void”
- “But that statute requiring the corporation, as a condition precedent to obtaining a permit to do business within the State, to surrender a right and privilege secured to it by the constitution and laws of the United States, was unconstitutional and void[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.