Skip to main content

Katz v. Katz

Citations

  • 514 A.2d 1374
  • 356 Pa. Super. 461
  • 13 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1296
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 11838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “divorce hearings are the type of proceedings which courts may close to protect the rights of the parties”
  • recognizing that “no legitimate purpose can be served by broadcasting the intimate details of a soured marital relationship,” however, good cause must be shown before a proceeding can be closed
  • a final order is one which either ends the litigation or disposes of the entire case
  • common law rule which confers public right of access to judicial proceedings is not absolute
  • “[T]he details of divorce involve matters which are essentially private in nature and . . . lack any useful, public purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham, Wieand, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.