S.D. New York· 2/27/2017
Katsoris v. WME IMG, LLC
Citations
- 237 F. Supp. 3d 92
- 2017 WL 775849
- 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27990
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the extent of litigation did not weigh in favor of waiver because “[a]lthough the parties ha[d] briefed outstanding motions, they [had] not conducted any discovery”
- concluding that the extent of litigation did not weigh in favor of waiver because “[a]lthough the parties ha[d] briefed outstanding motions, they [had] not conducted any discovery”
- holding that the “founder and president” of a non- profit could compel arbitration of the arbitrability of his claims even though only the non-profit, and not he, was a signatory to the arbitration agreement
- noting that in this Circuit, “where some but not all claims are referable to arbitration, a district court may stay proceedings in its discretion”
- finding that the extent of litigation did not weigh in favor waiver because, although the parties had “briefed outstanding motions, they ha[d] not conducted any discovery”
- explaining that it is “clear that a nonsignatory party may be bound to an arbitration agreement if so dictated by the ‘ordinary principles of contract and agency.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abrams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 4,474×
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-12-10· cited 1,948×
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 1,641×
- Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Second Circuit· 2016-08-25· cited 986×
- Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationSecond Circuit· 1995-08-24· cited 847×
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamSecond Circuit· 1986-05-23· cited 524×
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Second Circuit· 1987-04-01· cited 414×
- Katz v. Cellco PartnershipSecond Circuit· 2015-07-28· cited 372×
- CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantSecond Circuit· 2005-02-14· cited 361×
- Oliveri v. ThompsonSecond Circuit· 1986-10-15· cited 294×
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Emily DistajoSecond Circuit· 1997-02-24· cited 287×
- Schnabel v. Trilegiant Corp. & Affinion, Inc.Second Circuit· 2012-09-07· cited 282×
- Louis Dreyfus Negoce S.A. v. Blystad Shipping & Trading Inc.Second Circuit· 2001-06-07· cited 222×
- Bensadoun v. Jobe-RiatSecond Circuit· 2003-01-13· cited 220×
- Mag Portfolio Consult, Gmbh v. Merlin Biomed Group LLC and Merlin Biomed Advisors LLCSecond Circuit· 2001-10-10· cited 209×
- Leadertex, Inc. v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Corp.Second Circuit· 1995-09-28· cited 193×
- Worldcrisa Corporation and Crisa Corporation v. Patrick J. ArmstrongSecond Circuit· 1997-10-16· cited 186×
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaSecond Circuit· 1991-11-08· cited 138×
- Choctaw Generation Limited Partnership v. American Home Assurance CompanySecond Circuit· 2001-11-16· cited 122×
- NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. v. UBS Securities, LLCSecond Circuit· 2014-10-31· cited 114×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.