Katsoris v. WME IMG, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the extent of litigation did not weigh in favor of waiver because “[a]lthough the parties ha[d] briefed outstanding motions, they [had] not conducted any discovery”
• concluding that the extent of litigation did not weigh in favor of waiver because “[a]lthough the parties ha[d] briefed outstanding motions, they [had] not conducted any discovery”
• holding that the “founder and president” of a non- profit could compel arbitration of the arbitrability of his claims even though only the non-profit, and not he, was a signatory to the arbitration agreement
• noting that in this Circuit, “where some but not all claims are referable to arbitration, a district court may stay proceedings in its discretion”
• finding that the extent of litigation did not weigh in favor waiver because, although the parties had “briefed outstanding motions, they ha[d] not conducted any discovery”
• explaining that it is “clear that a nonsignatory party may be bound to an arbitration agreement if so dictated by the ‘ordinary principles of contract and agency.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).