Skip to main content
· 2/14/2005

CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 398 F.3d 205
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that signatory to arbitration agreement was compelled to arbitrate question of arbitrability with nonsignatory
  • holding that incorporation of AAA Rules, including Rule 7(a), clearly and unmistakably evinced intent for arbitrator to decide whether nonsignatory party bound by arbitration agreement
  • concluding that signatory to an arbitration agreement must arbitrate dispute against nonsignatory because issue of arbitrability itself is subject to a decision by the arbitrator
  • holding that incorporation of AAA Rules, including Rule 7(a), clearly and unmistakably evinced intent for arbitrator to decide whether nonsignatory party bound by arbitration agreement
  • holding that incorporation of AAA Rules, including Rule 7(a), clearly and unmistakably evinced intent for arbitrator to decide whether nonsignatory party bound by arbitration agreement
  • holding that post-merger survivor corporation could invoke arbitration agreement signed by corporation subsumed in merger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Jacobs, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.