· 10/3/2003
Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel Glickman
Citations
- 346 F.3d 579
- 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 289
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20191
- 2003 WL 22259482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no prejudice when “the plaintiffs had a fair opportunity to respond to the government’s statute of limitations argument”
- APA case noting that the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that a defendant waives if not timely asserted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith, Batchelder, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.