Skip to main content
· 10/3/2003

Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel Glickman

Citations

  • 346 F.3d 579
  • 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 289
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20191
  • 2003 WL 22259482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no prejudice when “the plaintiffs had a fair opportunity to respond to the government’s statute of limitations argument”
  • APA case noting that the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that a defendant waives if not timely asserted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Batchelder, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.