Herr v. United States Forest Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although neither party fully complied with Rule 4:46-2, summary judgment was still ripe as the material facts were not disputed
• explaining a court need only consider the facts properly raised to the motion court in the parties' Rule 4:46-2 statements
• refusing to consider \factual assertions in [the] appeal that were not properly included in the motion . . . for summary judgment below\ pursuant to Rule 4:46-2
• refusing to consider \factual assertions in [the] appeal that were not properly included in the motion . . . for summary judgment below\ pursuant to Rule 4:46-2
• refusing to consider \factual assertions in [the] appeal that were not properly included in the motion . . . for summary judgment below\ pursuant to Rule 4:46-2
• refusing to consider \factual assertions in [the] appeal that were not properly included in the motion . . . for summary judgment below\ pursuant to Rule 4:46-2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).