Skip to main content
· 11/5/2009

Ray v. FEDIX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.

Citations

  • 668 F. Supp. 2d 1063
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126110
  • 2009 WL 3711997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that for the same language at issue in this case that \[i]t does not appear that the filing of a charge with the EEOC constitutes 'legal action' as that terms appears in the 'Employment Agreement' in this case.\
  • statutes of limitations are procedural, and nothing in the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act applies to preclude procedural contractual modifications to the limitations period
  • “Rule 8 does not create a distinction between a statute of limitations defense and a defendant’s assertion that a plaintiff's complaint is contractually time-barred.”
  • six-month limitation period upheld with respect to the plaintiff's federal age discrimination claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jon Phipps McCalla

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.