Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 6/17/2013

Kate Spade LLC v. Saturdays Surf LLC

Citations

  • 950 F. Supp. 2d 639
  • 2013 WL 2986454
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that while the composite mark “Saturdays Surf NYC” was moderately strong, it was weakened by the fact that the word actually in dispute—‘Saturdays”——had extensive, legitimate third party use
  • $40-100 apparel not “priced at an ‘impulse’ purchase level for most consumers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cedarbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.