· 11/23/2004
Playtex Products, Inc. v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Fort James Operating Corporation
Citations
- 390 F.3d 158
- 73 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1127
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24345
- 2004 WL 2660566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “Wet Ones” is suggestive and stating: ‘Wet Ones, like Wite-Out, could plausibly describe a wide variety of products.”
- concluding that district court correctly found “Wet Ones” to be a suggestive mark for pre-moistened towelettes
- noting that “consumers cannot be expected to invest much time or effort in distinguishing among inexpensive bath tissues”
- noting that the confusion of an internet search engine in distinguishing between similar marks did not amount to consumer confusion
- concluding that “moist” and “wet” were dissimilar despite being “almost synonymous”
- holding “Wet Ones” was a suggestive mark because, “without more, [the mark] does not itself conjure up the image of a towelette”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobs, Sotomayor, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.